communicated to you.
the letter forma
14
of October the
this chapt
to last
printed copy is now enclosed
for convenience
of reference.
The case appears
to fit Littellion to request
further elucidation &
to ask Sir Mi
hattian for further
proposes
information
the following
points
(1) Have the men
matter
of fact caused
a
heavy
loss, and, if so, what expense to the Colony?
(2)
At what date
after their discharge
did they become
charge upon the Colony?
How long did the
money
in their possession
last & how long might
it have been reasonably
expected to last?
(3) Is it clearly
the
Capt. Barnes
Laurence states that
under their agreement
they
could legally
have refused to be
paid off, if
their agreement
were complied with?
and what because of
the two men
refused to be paid off? (4) Is it clearly
the
Capt
Barnes
Laurance states that
Crews
paid off in
Hauling
habit
And
au
of allowing deductions at their pay
to be deposited
with the Harbour Master,
communicated to you.
the letter forma
14
of October the
this chapt
to last
printed copy is now welosed
fort convenience
of reference.
ве
The case appears
to hit Littellion to request
further elucidation &
to ask Sir Mi
hattian for further
proposes
information
the following
pant's
(1) Han the men
matter
of fact caused
a
avy
and, if so, wheat expanse to the Colmcial for!?
(2)
Ab what date
after their discharge
did they became
Ch
charge upon the Colmy
1.6.
money
how long did the
in their possim
lest & how long might
557
it has be reas matly
expected to last?
(3) Is it clearly
Compta
t
Quy
the
Capt. Bames.
Laurence states that
L
under their agreement
Ite
mei
could legally
have refused 56
paid off, if
them off paying
тельно
g
their agrement.
ware compli obscured?
and what because of
the two men
ملمى
refused the paid off? (4) Is it clearly
Case
am
Capt
the
Bames
Laurance states that
Creus
paid off in
Haughing
habt
And
au
of allowing deductims at their to be deposited pay
wille
the Harbour haster,
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.